Uranus Transits Mars: My Eco-Lifestyle Changes

Yesterday, I was talking about how horrified I’ve been by the carbon footprints we leave behind. Under this Uranus transit to Mars, I’ve become much more conscious of my actions. But last night, I worked through it all a bit more clearly and realized it’s not as limiting as I initially thought. I thought I’d be doomed to be a silent statue, brooding under eco-guilt, but it’s just being more consciously aware.

To limit global warming to 1.5°C, the average person on Earth should aim for under 2 tonnes (2,000 kg) of CO₂ per year per person, The world average today is around 4–5 tonnes per person. In high-income countries (like the U.S., UK, Canada, Australia), it’s often 10–20 tonnes+

Lifestyle Annual CO₂ (tonnes)
Typical U.S. resident 16–20 tonnes
Average EU resident 7–10 tonnes
Car-free, low-energy lifestyle 3–4 tonnes
Eco-minimalist lifestyle (no flying, vegan, etc.) ~2 tonnes (or less)

What Makes Up Your Carbon Footprint?

Category Contribution (Approx.)
 Home energy Heating, electricity
Transportation Driving, flying
Food Meat, dairy, packaging
Consumption Clothes, electronics
Digital use Streaming, internet

 

Rating Yearly CO₂ Emissions Notes
Excellent 2 tonnes Aligns with climate targets
Good 2–5 tonnes Very climate-conscious lifestyle
Moderate 5–10 tonnes Needs reduction
High 10+ tonnes Unsustainable long-term for the planet

On my previous lifestyle I was rated:

“Based on your lifestyle, your estimated annual carbon footprint is approximately 3.5 tonnes of CO₂. This is well below the average for many developed countries (which is 10–20 tonnes). You’re closer to the global climate target of 2 tonnes per person per year. With just a few more tweaks (e.g., green energy provider, lowering digital intensity), you could reach near-sustainable levels.”

Apparently, my desktop uses more energy than a television, so it’s the main thing to avoid. Light web browsing isn’t too harmful—it’s the heavier activities like video generation, streaming, gaming, and so on that really consume resources. You don’t necessarily have to cut your TV time drastically if your other choices are mindful and low-impact.

I got this plan online:

Your Actual Annual Estimate (rounded):

Category Estimated CO₂/year
Digital (devices, TV, music) ~350–400 kg
 Food (vegetarian, mostly home-cooked) ~600–700 kg
Heating (winter only, 3–4 hrs/day) ~110–130 kg
Bathing (1/week in winter) ~15–20 kg
 Kettle, lights, router, waste, misc. ~300–400 kg
 Flying, driving Zero
Total ~1400–1600 kg/year

Only having one bath a week in winter feels really harsh. But since my overall usage is so low and well below my target, I can afford to add more baths through the week. I’m not much of a fan of showers, to be honest. I’ll have to make a real effort to stick to just four hours of heating a day in winter—but that can definitely be tough.

Perhaps it means heavier jumpers, warm drinks, thick socks

Here’s my digital allowance:

Full Weekly Digital CO₂ Tally (with entertainment)

Device/Activity Weekly Hours Weekly CO₂
Tablet + browsing 10 hrs (Mon–Fri) ~0.35 kg
Laptop + browsing 10 hrs (Mon–Fri) ~1.2 kg
Desktop + light editing 10 hrs (Mon–Fri) ~2.2 kg
HD TV (2 hrs/day) 14 hrs total ~2.8 kg
Music Streaming 7 hrs total ~0.35 kg

So I still get plenty of internet time and stay under my limits. If someone preferred watching more television, their balance might look a bit different. For me, it’s about two hours on the tablet in the morning, where I write out my posts. Then I spend around two hours on the desktop editing the main posts. I also edit three older posts daily, which usually takes at least a couple of hours—sometimes a bit more—so I’m planning to switch to using my laptop in power-saving mode for those longer sessions.

Overall, it’s not nearly as restrictive as I initially thought. I actually feel like I have loads of time. It just looks like a lot because I do all my work on the computer—this is essentially my day job. I also read on my Kindle throughout the day and take notes as part of my work routine, but since that uses very little energy, it’s hardly worth counting. It’s one of the most efficient tools I use, and it fits well into this lower-impact lifestyle.

I imagined myself sitting in the digital dark, deprived of screens and modern comforts, but instead I’ve found abundance. The hours haven’t magically multiplied, but I will have to learn to inhabit them fully, not scattering them to the winds of distraction and excess (same with telly). Morning creativity on the tablet; mid-day refinement at the desktop, where thoughts get shaped and tied up; and then quiet, contemplative editing sessions, where I reflect on the work I’ve already done—edit or revamp the whole thing. For someone else, the equation might skew differently. More TV, less typing. More audio books, fewer browser tabs. But the key is balance. It isn’t strict rules. By working within boundaries I can improve sustainability. It’s a kind of new freedom. The kind that comes from choosing, again and again, to live with awareness.

Tagged:

Related Posts